Migrating: GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 Sol
Green marks the cheaper/newer side per row where a direction genuinely applies
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 01, 2025 | Feb 16, 2026 |
| Standard input price | $5.00/MTok | $5.00/MTok |
| Reasoning effort levels | Not published | Not published |
| Long-context repricing rule | Published | Published |
| Rate-limit tier group (Tier 1) | 500 RPM | 500 RPM |
The smallest step on this site's migration list in terms of what actually changes — these two share a context window, a rate-limit group, and the long-context repricing rule, which makes this migration almost entirely about two things: recency, and how caching gets billed.
What actually moves
Sol's knowledge cutoff runs meaningfully more recent than GPT-5.5's — the clearest, most immediate reason to make this move. Standard input and output pricing is identical between the two, so unlike most migrations on this list, price isn't a factor in the decision at all. The one real cost-side change is caching: GPT-5.5 writes to the cache for free, while Sol charges the GPT-5.6-family markup on every write.
What stays put
Window, maximum output, rate-limit group and the long-context rule are all unchanged. A workload sized against GPT-5.5 doesn't need re-sizing for this move on any of those axes.
What to check before switching
If your task doesn't depend on very recent knowledge, this migration is close to a wash except for caching — and for a workload that writes many cache prefixes without reading most of them back, GPT-5.5's free writes can make it the cheaper real-world choice despite matching Sol on every other published number. Run the actual caching pattern through the prompt-caching savings calculator before assuming "newer" is automatically "better" here; this is the one pairing on this site where it genuinely might not be, cost-wise.
Verified 2026-08-09 against CodexHow facts module (src/data/facts/) — see /about/#accuracy.